People
Choose which employees, service accounts, and roles can request governed work.
Security
Glaux puts company rules in the path of work. Admins decide which people and teams can use which knowledge, tools, models, and sensitive actions, and when a person must approve the next step.
Send the summary outside the company workspace.
Before action
Rule applied: approval is required before anything is sent.
The activity history records the request, decision, outcome, and policy context that applied.
Security starts with plain boundaries: who is asking, which team they are working in, what source or tool is involved, and whether the next step needs approval.
Choose which employees, service accounts, and roles can request governed work.
Group permissions by workspace or team so access follows how the company operates.
Make approved connections available only where they belong, with unsafe requests stopped before use.
Set which model and provider choices are available for the work being done.
Require approval or stop work before high-impact actions such as external sharing or data export.
Approval and access requests
When work needs access to a source, tool, model, or sensitive action, the request stays attached to the reason for the work. Approvers see the context before deciding.
Reason: answer a renewal-risk question with the approved source trail visible.
The rule is checked before the action. The record is written after the result. Glaux should not make teams wait for after-the-fact evidence to find out whether an action was allowed.
Check identity, workspace, approved source, tool, model, policy, and approval requirements before a governed read or side effect happens.
Keep the outcome visible through activity history, approval history, and audit-oriented admin views.
Security and governance teams need to see where controls applied without turning internal secrets or raw configuration into visitor-facing explanations.
Admins can review what moved ahead, what needed approval, and what stopped before action.
Security reviewers get a governance view without exposing secrets, private prompts, or raw internal configuration.
Data and deployment diligence
A security review should map the real categories involved: people and groups, approved knowledge sources, tool connections, model choices, skills, automations, approvals, access requests, and activity records.
Glaux treats deployment, data handling, and evidence sharing as review topics until the approved terms are clear for your environment.
Service calls are authenticated and versioned before protected Control Tower paths accept them.
Signed Control Tower service requests bind method, path and raw query, request ID, contract version, and body hash, with replay protection.
Control Tower owns authorization, approvals, runtime activity, audit, and safe projections while clients can request and display decisions but cannot grant authority.
Admin and activity surfaces should expose safe explanations and audit pivots, not secrets, private prompts, or raw credentials.
Audit-oriented admin views are designed for filtered lookup and controlled export rather than public log exposure.
Standards posture
Glaux security posture supports alignment with NIST AI RMF and OWASP agentic, MCP, and agentic skills guidance as design input. Standards are design input here, not proof of third-party review.